ABSTRACT
With the maturity of kidney transplantation, introduction of new immunosuppressive drugs and improvement of immunosuppressive regimen, the short-term survival rate of kidney transplant recipients has been significantly improved, whereas the long-term survival rate has not been significantly elevated. Kidney transplant recipients may have the risk of renal graft loss. Clinical management after renal graft loss is complicated, including the adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs, management of renal graft and selection of subsequent renal replacement therapy. These management procedures directly affect clinical prognosis of patients with renal graft loss. Nevertheless, relevant guidelines or consensuses are still lacking. Clinical management of patients after renal graft loss highly depend upon clinicians’ experience. In this article, the adjustment of immunosuppressive drugs, management of renal graft and selection of subsequent renal replacement therapy were reviewed, aiming to provide reference for prolonging the survival and improving the quality of life of these patients.
ABSTRACT
Objective To evaluate the effect of multi-disciplinary team (MDT) on acute heart failure (AHF) complicated with respiratory failure after allograft nephrectomy. Methods MDT discussion was performed on a patient with hemorrhagic shock caused by sudden renal graft hemorrhage, who developed acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with AHF, acute pulmonary congestion, pulmonary infection and acute respiratory failure 2 weeks after allograft nephrectomy. And treatment plan was formulated and effect evaluation was conducted. Results Based on the opinions of MDT discussion, the patient was given nasal high-flow oxygen therapy, continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) to reduce cardiac load, anticoagulant, dilating blood vessels, reducing myocardial oxygen consumption, improving myocardial remodeling, lipid regulation, anti-infection, nutritional support, and other comprehensive treatment. The clinical outcome of the patient was good and regular hemodialysis treatment was resumed. Conclusions Application of MDT pattern helps to formulate a comprehensive and effective individualized treatment plan for patients with AHF and respiratory failure after allograft nephrectomy, which can enhance clinical treatment effects and improve prognosis of patient.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Allograft nephrectomy has been done in considerable proportion due to many reasons after kidney transplantation. This study was undertaken to determine the incidence, causes, and time of allograft nephrectomy after kidney transplantation. METHODS: A total 141 kidney transplantations were performed between 1993 and 2003 Kyung Hee University Hospital. We found 22 cases of allograft nephrectomy in the same period and a retrospective analysis was conducted on 22 allograft nephrectomy. The patients records were reviewed for age, causes, and time of allograft nephrectomy after kidney transplantation. RESULTS: The pathological causes of allograft nephrectomy were chronic rejection in 18 cases (81.8%), acute rejection in 3 cases (13.6%), accelerated rejection in 2 cases (9.1%) and allograft infection, renal vessel thrombosis, cyclosporin toxicity, GVHD in each one case (4.5%). Of 18 cases with chronic rejection, acute rejection episode was occurred in 12 cases (66.7%). The interval from kidney transplantation to allograft nephrectomy was more than 5 years in most patients (63.6%). CONCLUSION: In our studies, allograft nephrectomy was performed in 22 cases, chronic rejection was major cause of allograft nephrectomy, and acute rejection episide was occurred in most chronic rejection. We suggested that early detection and aggressive treatment of acute rejection might be considered to lower the incidence of allograft nephrectomy after kidney transplantation.